UGC stands for College Scholarship Commission. The University Grants Commission of India (UGC India) is a statutory body established by the Union government of India in accordance with the UGC Act, 1956.[1] dependent on the Ministry of Human Resources Development, and is charged with coordinating, securing and supporting advanced education models. It gives recognition to the universities in India and grants assets to such perceived universities and schools. Teacher. Ved Prakash is the occupying Chairman of UGC, India. His head office is in New Delhi and six local foci in Pune, Bhopal, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Guwahati and Bangalore.
In the most recent week of May, the University Grants Commission (UGC) established a board of trustees to establish a comprehensive list of genuine academic journals across the board. If all goes as planned, Indian academics, at least those based in state-funded universities and other academic organizations, should publish in UGC’s registered journals to be eligible to score points under the Academic Performance Indicators (API) framework. . and become clearly qualified for advancement and other benefits. Similar principles will apply for new PhDs seeking academic jobs, to acquire approaches and improve their chances of obtaining teaching and research positions (Meanwhile, there are reports that universities may also suggest journals for consideration on the list and that the UGC board of trustees will make a limited decision on the matter).
The need for a comprehensive list of honest journals arose because an increasing number of professors and scientists in Indian academic institutions, including many at prestigious universities, were publishing in bogus and also poor journals to secure advancement or business. University pundits routinely dismiss such practices on the grounds that, as a rule, the bad habits of chancellors, executives, senior members, and division heads have been circulated in questionable magazines to get promoted to their positions. Sheer indifference to the investigation of morality has also added to such works to become plainly ordinary.
Three sets of questions appear to be particularly vital.
1. How genuine is the problem of shoddy and fake magazine distribution among staff in India? Does the UGC really need to establish an ace roundup of true blue journals? The correct answer: The act of publishing in fake newspapers has no limits in India and since the university authorities themselves are not enthusiastic about solving the problem, the UGC wants to venture.
2. Is it feasible for the UGC to prepare such a comprehensive and complete list of transversal controls? Shouldn’t the UGC basically outsource this work to a fully equipped office and save themselves the trouble? Answer: Whether or not the UGC board outsources the project to Thomson Reuters or Elsevier, there will always be explanations behind the concern. Regardless of the possibility of the UGC board reading an abstract of the journals autonomously, it will probably wake up to journal records organized by Thomson Reuters or Elsevier. In any case, the ace list could ban honest and relevant journals, especially in sociologies and humanities. The list may also end up giving undue importance to specific journals essentially because of their high impact rating despite the possibility that they are not especially significant for Indian social researchers, and victimizing others that are more relevant to science teachers. India all over the world.
3. It is important to ask if the main abstract of UGC will help to control the act of publishing in bogus and substandard journals. Undoubtedly, the biggest problem is the importance of the abstract in addressing the biggest problem of research misrepresentation.
Syndication in bogus and substandard journals is now an “old” practice; New research misrepresentation systems, including review of PC-produced articles, have recently been developed and have become very common. A roundup of the true blue magazines, despite the possibility that they will be fully and routinely reviewed, will only partially affect the extortion investigation. Those inclined to cheat will basically switch to new techniques.